| topic (iv) Access to business microdata for analysis |
|
|
|
| A standard for the release of microdata (Germany), Invited paper |
|
|
|
|
|
| Estimation of the Probit Model from anonymized microdata (University of Tuebingen), Invited paper |
|
|
|
|
|
| Methods of secure computation and data integration (National Institute of Statistical Sciences, University of Cincinnati, Duke University and Bristol-Myers Squibb), Invited paper |
|
|
|
|
|
| Empirical disclosure risk assessment of the IPSO synthetic data generators (Rovira i Virgili University of Tarragona and IIIA-CSIC), Invited paper |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Access to business microdata in the UK: dealing with the irreducible risks (United Kingdom) Supporting paper |
|
|
|
| topic (v) Confidentiality aspects of tabular data, frequency tables, etc. |
|
|
|
| Safety rules in statistical disclosure control for tabular data (United Kingdom), Invited paper |
|
|
|
|
|
| Effects of rounding on data quality (United States), Invited paper |
|
|
|
|
|
| Confidentiality protection by controlled tabular adjustment using metaheuristic methods (United States), Invited paper |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Information Loss Measures for Frequency Tables (United Kingdom, University of Southampton and Hebrew University), Invited paper |
|
|
|
|
|
| Protecting tables with cell perturbation (University of La Laguna, Spain), Invited paper |
|
|
|
|
|
| A proposed method for confidentialising tabular output to protect against differencing (Australia), Supporting paper |
|
|
|
|
|
| Controlled rounding implementation (United Kingdom and University of La Laguna), Supporting paper |
|
|
|
|
|
| A process for writing standards and guidance for tabular outputs from ONS (United Kingdom), Supporting paper |
|
|
|
|
|
| Using fixed intervals to protect sensitive cells instead of cell suppression (United States), Supporting paper |
|
|
|
| topic (vi) Software for statistical disclosure control |
|
|
|
| The 'Jackknife' method: Confidentiality protection for complex statistical analyses (Germany), Invited paper |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Testing variants of minimum distance controlled tabular adjustment (Germany and University of Catalunya, Spain), Invited paper |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Complementary cell suppression software tools for statistical disclosure control - reality check (United States), Invited paper |
|
|
|
|
|
| Improving confidentiality with t-ARGUS by focussing on clever usage of microdata (Netherlands), Supporting paper |
|
|
|
|
|
| Disclosure analysis for the Census of Agriculture (United States), Supporting paper |
|
|
|
|
|
| SUDA: a program for detecting special uniques (University of Manchester), Invited paper |
|
|
|
| topic (vii) General statistical confidentiality issues |
|
|
|
| Glossary on Statistical Disclosure Control, Invited paper |
|
|
|
|
|
| Providing access to data and making microdata safe - experiences of the ONS (United Kingdom), Invited paper |
|
|
|
|
|
| Legal, political and methodological issues in confidentiality in the ESS (Eurostat), Invited paper |
|
|
|
|
|
| Managing statistical confidentiality and microdata access - Draft principles and guidelines of good practice (Australia), Invited paper |
|
|
|
|
|
| The Institut de la statistique du Québec’s Approach to the Confidentiality of Microdata Files and Tabular Data (Canada), Supporting paper |
|
|
|
|
|
| Statistics and confidentiality in the Portuguese case (Portugal), Supporting paper |
|
|
|
|
|
| 2003 questionnaire on statistical confidentiality, summary of replies from Central and Eastern Europe (UNECE), Supporting paper |
|
|
|
