The objective of the training session was twofold: (i) to improve the knowledge of governmental experts in the area of identification of hazardous activities under the Convention and under the Seveso II Directive (96/82/EC) as well as to enhance awareness of industry with respect to the potential risk of hazardous activities; and (ii) to discuss with representatives of the countries about the follow-up to the workshop on indicators and criteria for the implementation of the Strategic Approach (Bratislava, 3-6 May 2011).
Regional training session on identification of hazardous activities for Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan
Regional training session on identification of hazardous activities for Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan
22 November (10:00) - 23 November (18:00) 2011
Bishkek Kyrgyzstan
Presentations
| Document Title | ENG | RUS |
|---|---|---|
| DAY 1 – Tuesday, 22 November 2011 | ||
| Setting the scene: The identification of hazardous activities | ||
| The Convention in Kyrgyzstan: The implementation of the Convention in Kyrgyzstan | ||
| The Convention in Tajikistan: The implementation of the Convention in Tajikistan – Mr. Djamshed Kamalov, Representative of the Committee for Emergency Situations | ||
| SESSION I – The identification of hazardous activities under the Convention | ||
| The identification of hazardous activities in the framework of the Industrial Accidents Convention – Ms. Virginia Fusé, Secretariat of the Convention on the Transboundary Effects of Industrial Accidents | ||
| Identification of hazardous activities in Tajikistan: Legal framework for collecting, processing and maintaining information on hazardous activities and experiences from the country – Mr. Hursand Nasriev, Representative of Gosgortechnadsor,Tajikistan | ||
| Identification of hazardous activities in Kyrgyzstan: Legal framework for collecting, processing and maintaining information on hazardous activities and experiences from the country – Representative from Kyrgyzstan | ||
| The Italian approach to the identification of hazardous activities under the Convention – Mr. Giorgio Mattiello (Italy) | ||
| The Serbian approach to the identification of hazardous activities under the Convention – Ms. Suzana Milutinovic (Serbia) | ||
| Discussion on possible ways forward for collecting, processing and maintaining information on hazardous activities – Mr. Viktor Novikov, Moderator | ||
| SESSION II – Annex I to the Convention as an instrument to identify hazardous activities | ||
| Annex I of the Convention and its application for the identification of hazardous activities – Mr. Giorgio Mattiello | ||
| Annex I of the Convention and Annex I of the Seveso II Directive: Two harmonized approaches for the same aim – Ms. Suzana Milutinovic | ||
| Case study: Case study on identification of hazardous activities using Annex I – Mr. Giorgio Mattiello | ||
| SESSION III – Location criteria for the identification of hazardous activities – Application of scenarios, risk assessment and location criteria | ||
| Location criteria for activities involving substance that may be released in to water paths and air path in case of accidents – Ms. Suzana Milutinovic | ||
| DAY 2 – Wednesday, 23 November 2011 | ||
| Continuation of SESSION III | ||
| Case study on “worst-case scenario” – Mr. Giorgio Mattiello (Italy) | ||
| The way forward for Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan – Mr. Viktor Novikov, Moderator | ||
| SESSION IV – Follow-up to the workshop on indicators and criteria | ||
| Summary of the main outcomes from the workshop on indicators and criteria – Ms. Virginia Fusé | ||
| Example of a self-assessment of a country – Ms. Suzana Milutinovic | ||
| The advantage of using indicators and criteria for the preparation of project proposals – Mr. Giorgio Mattiello | ||
| The essential elements of a project proposal – Ms. Virginia Fusé | ||
| Results – Update from Kyrgyzstan after the participation to the workshop on indicators and criteria | ||
| Results – Update from Tajikistan after the participation to the workshop on indicators and criteria |