Skip to main content

Publications

Displaying Results 101 - 120 of 138

- English
Ten years have passed since UNECE received its mandate to undertake Environmental Performance Reviews. To mark the decade, assess progress and propose the Programme’s future direction, UNECE undertook the analysis contained in this publication.
- English
ECE would also like to express its appreciation to the Governments of Denmark, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands and Sweden for their support to the Environmental Performance Review Programme, to the United Nations Mission in Kosovo (UNMIK), United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) offices in Belgrade and Podgorica, to the UNEP Regional Office in Europe (ROE), and to the WHO European
- English
The report covers a wide range of issues related to the environment, covering three broad themes: the framework for environmental policy and management, management of pollution and natural resources and economic and sectoral integration. The team’s final report contains recommendations for further improvement, taking into consideration the country’s progress in the current transition period.
- English
 This is the first EPR of the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia published by ECE. The report covers issues of importance to Belarus,, including the decision-making framework, economic instruments and financing, environmental information and public participation, waste management, air management, water management, agriculture and biodiversity, industry, energy, spatial planning,
- English
A first Environmental Performance Review of Estonia was undertaken in 1995 as a pilot project by UNECE. In September 2000, the UNECE Committee on Environmental Policy agreed to the Estonian request for a second review. The review team included national experts from Denmark, Finland, France and Hungary, together with the UNECE secretariat.Synopsis
- English
This is the first EPR of Romania. Thereafter, the review team of international experts included experts from Bulgaria, Denmark, France, Italy, Netherlands, Poland, Slovakia, Sweden, Switzerland, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, together with experts from the secretariat of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE), the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) and
- English
This is the first EPR of Uzbekistan. The review team of international experts was constituted. It included experts from Armenia, Croatia, Denmark, Estonia, France, Germany, Poland and the Russian Federation together with experts from the secretariat of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE) and the European Centre for Environment and Health of the World Health Organization (
- English
The report is the first EPR of Kazakhstan. The review team included national experts from Finland, France, Denmark, Germany, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain and Uzbekistan, together with the ECE secretariat, UNEP and the Bilthoven Division of the WHO European Centre for Environment and Health. The costs of the participation of experts from countries in transition, as well as the travel
- English
This report is about the 1st EPR of Kyrgyzstan. The review team was constituted following these decisions and included national experts from Armenia, Belgium, Denmark, Germany, Switzerland and the Russian Federation, together with the ECE secretariat, experts from the International Strategy for Disaster Reduction (ISDR), the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) and from the Bilthoven
- English
A first Environmental Performance Review of Bulgaria had been undertaken in 1995 as a joint project between ECE and OECD. In September 1999, the UNECE Committee on Environmental Policy agreed to the Bulgarian request for a second review by UNECE. The project was the first second-round review of the EPR programme in a country in transition. The review team included national experts from Denmark
- English
This is the first EPR of Armenia. The review team for the project was constituted and included national experts from Bulgaria, Croatia, Denmark, Slovakia and the Russian Federation, together with the ECE secretariat, experts from UNEP and from the Rome Division of the WHO European Centre for Environment and Health. The costs of the participation of experts from countries in transition, as well
- English
Disclaimer: The above-listed publications are not official documents of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE). They have not been endorsed by UNECE, the Meeting of the Parties to the UNECE Aarhus Convention, or any of its subsidiary bodies. UNECE assumes no responsibility for the absolute accuracy of the information presented in these publications; nor for
- English
United Kingdom Read more (also known as the Newcastle Handbook) - English and Russian
- English